Defense Dynamics
Defense Dynamics shows how engine-identified defensive issue patterns and findings appear inside defensive fencing contexts. It helps users understand defensive-context movement patterns, response profile, and pressure-related behavior from eligible video material.
What this report is
Defense Dynamics reads engine-identified defensive issue patterns and findings inside defensive context. It shows how those patterns may appear when the athlete responds to pressure, manages distance, delays the action, or stabilizes the defensive exchange.
This report should not be read as a point-by-point description of every moment in the video. It should be read as an aggregated interpretation of how defensive behavior appears in defensive situations.
Available modes
Static
A static Defense Dynamics report is based on one eligible defensive-context video or one selected eligible session. It shows the aggregated defensive reading for that material.
Longitudinal
A longitudinal Defense Dynamics report requires at least 5 eligible comparable videos. It shows how defensive issue patterns and findings evolve across the observed material.
This report can also support contextual versus analysis on one eligible film when both athletes are sufficiently visible and the comparison is made across opposite tactical contexts.
Input requirements
Static report
Use 1 eligible video where the defensive action, athlete body, weapon hand, weapon line, and relevant opponent interaction are sufficiently visible.
Longitudinal report
Use 5+ eligible comparable videos of the same athlete, preferably with similar camera angle, visibility, defensive context, and recording quality.
Contextual versus
Use 1 eligible film where both athletes are visible enough for comparison. Opposite tactical contexts must be identifiable in the selected action.
Video quality matters
Poor framing, occlusion, blur, low resolution, unstable camera, or missing weapon/body visibility may reduce reliability or lead to partial output.
Contextual versus analysis
Single film
In contextual versus, the comparison is made on a single film.
Reference athlete
A reference athlete is selected. If the reference side is read in offensive context, the opponent side can be read in defensive context, and vice versa.
Metrics and diagnosis
Only metrics with valid measured values on both sides of the comparison are displayed. Diagnoses use Bad, Average, and Good, with severity used as a tie-breaker when needed.
How to read this report
Read it as an aggregated defensive view
This report should be read as an aggregated interpretation of defense, not as frame-by-frame labeling and not as a replacement for the general reports.
Use it when the question is defensive
It is most useful when you want to understand how selected findings appear in defensive response profile, defensive-context consistency, and pressure-related behavior.
Common report logic
Phenomenon
What the system observed in the defensive context.
Causes
Why the observed defensive pattern may appear biomechanically.
Effects
How the observed pattern may influence defensive performance expression.
How it differs from the other reports
Compared with Biomech Profile and Issue Dynamics
Biomech Profile and Issue Dynamics remain general. Defense Dynamics narrows the reading to defensive-context performance patterns.
Compared with Offense Dynamics
Defense Dynamics and Offense Dynamics use the same contextual logic, but they read selected findings in opposite tactical contexts.